Saturday, March 8, 2008

Smart House: Your So-Called Sci-Fi Life

Daniel H. Wilson’s first book, How to Survive a Robot Uprising, poked holes in our Hollywood-supplied anxiety over automaton-on-man violence, while quietly educating us on real-life robotics. Now the renowned author—and PM’s resident roboticist—is taking on the jetpack-commuting, Smell-O-Vision-scented future that never happened. His new book, Where’s My Jetpack? ($14.95, Bloomsbury), is funny—but it also turns out to be a tribute to the far-fetched ideas that often drive progress. In the last of four excerpts for PopularMechanics.com, Wilson tackles the "home of the future":

Since the beginning of time, children have performed all the duties of a so-called smart home: grabbing beers from fridges, changing television channels and taking verbal abuse for problems they don’t understand and probably didn’t cause. Considering that children have been around forever, it is only reasonable to expect that a better technology exists by now. Certainly, we should all be living in robotic houses that act as conscious, living servants to meet our every need and desire.

The now-ancient 1950s image of the “home of the future” was skewed toward rapid manufacturing. The home of the future was designed for mass production, easy transportation and quick construction; inside, the structure was invariably made of sterile white plastic with built-in furniture and a tiny kitchen. Living in the home of the future was like living in a Swiss army knife. Little did the 1950s denizens know that the true houses of the future would look the same as always, only with something extra that the other houses never had: brains.

So what is the secret to teaching an old house new tricks? One approach is to adopt a do-it-yourself mind-set and add futuristic skills like speech recognition (instead of a new patio). There is an entire home automation industry ready to supply gadgets that can be integrated to form a soulless automatic home. On the other hand, artificial intelligence can breathe life into a robotic home, allowing it to get to know its inhabitants enough to predict their activities and proclivities. Sinking smart robotics technology into the infrastructure of a home (or spaceship) is called ubiquitous computing. Whether you choose home automation or ubiquitous computing or both, don’t stop until your house can do a backflip for a mackerel.

Right now, “smart home” technology is available off the shelf; home automation enthusiasts have access to all kinds of gadgets that can make life simpler—and more complicated. The key goal for home automation is to give the occupant total control over the house from anywhere. Most home automation devices require a central personal computer to provide control and to run programs. For instance, X10 modules plug into the wall and then communicate with a home computer, letting a person turn on and off lights and appliances via a Web site. There are quite a few sensors, such as cameras, motion detectors or water leak detectors, that can be used to monitor who is in your driveway, trigger exterior lights when people approach or constantly check for broken water pipes. Meanwhile, effectors can be used to automatically water plants, remotely raise and lower blinds, or feed your pets. Anyone can create the ultimate remote-control house—the only limit is your wallet.

While there is nothing novel about a remote-controlled house, intelligent environments are another matter. A whole field of research is focused on blending high-tech computing into the home environment. Instead of interacting with a box on a table, occupants of the future will interact with a helpful, intelligent and friendly robotic home.

Sadly, fetching your beer is not a priority for smart homes. Instead, the most promising application is to help elderly people live safely and independently. According to census data, within two decades the age demographic of the United States will be the same as the age demographic in Florida today. Smart homes are being designed to use simple sensors common to home security systems and advanced artificial intelligence in order to figure out what people are doing (activity recognition) and where they are at (location estimation). The Georgia Tech Aware Home looks like a two-story house (see photo at right) but is in reality a laboratory bristling with sensing equipment, including cameras in the ceiling, microphones in the walls and invisible trip sensors in doorways. The Aware Home and other laboratories like it are the very first prototype smart homes that will help us all stay out of the nursing home someday.

The first series of smart homes is already on the market to help senior citizens live safely in their own homes. The home security corporation ADT recently launched the QuietCare 24-hour monitoring service. This system uses an ordinary home security infrastructure composed of motion detectors and contact switches, except instead of keeping burglars out, the system keeps a close eye on what happens inside the house. The system transmits information to ADT about occupants’ daily living activities 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Over time, a baseline of normal activity is set and an alarm triggers if the “normal routine” is broken. QuietCare exists so that caregivers and family can lovingly perform a virtual “check-in” with their elderly relative over the Internet. Sounds comforting, doesn’t it?

If you are frightened by disembodied voices that emanate from speakers in the walls, then you may want to complement your smart home with a mobile robot. In an experiment with Nursebot—a trashcan-sized, wheeled robot designed to deliver medicine and reminders (pictured at right)—at Carnegie Mellon University, researchers found that by using a laser-range finder, a robotic home could correctly predict the paths that people commonly take, so that mobile robots could learn to stay out of the way. Nursebot can use such knowledge to effectively cater to occupants. She even has grab bars so that elderly users can grab hold and stand up. Beat that, Rascal Scooter!

Smart houses are a reality, but most cutting-edge research is designed to make them into babysitters for the elderly. Home automation devices are available, but they require a lot of hard work, and the end result is a remote-control house—not a futuristic robotic companion. We can dream of a day when we can ask an obedient house to turn off the bedroom light and instead it makes a pot of steaming noodles, calls the fire department and then activates a self-destruct mechanism

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/technology_news/4216434.html